其實外國網友也有類似的問題
Q: Wouldn't a huge bomb weaken a hurricane? If they are worried about radioactivity, they could use powerful fuel-oil bombs.
A: A bomb or bombs would be a dead end since the amount of energy a hurricane is releasing and the size of its circulation would make any bomb, including the largest nuclear bomb, seem more futile than trying to stop a charging elephant by throwing a ping-pong ball at it. As noted above, hurricanes release tremendous amounts of heat energy. In fact, since hurricanes are "heat engines" that depend on the temperature contrast between warmth at the ocean surface and cold air aloft, we could wonder whether the heat from any kind of bomb would actually add to the storm's natural heat supply, making the storm stronger. Trying to heat the upper atmosphere with bombs, to lessen the heat contrast, would be like trying to heat the city of Minneapolis in January by opening the windows of a house.
Until recent years, many people suggested using nuclear bombs. But, doing that would create a hurricane with the danger of radioactivity as well as wind and storm surge.
文中提到 就算用最大的核子彈引爆
相較知下威力可能不如用乒乓球停下一之奔跑中的大象
對氣旋的影響力可說是微乎其微
加上熱帶氣旋本身就是靠暖水氣做為增強的能量
炸彈本身是放出來的熱量 可能反倒變成助長TC增強的來源
加上如果使用核彈 爆炸產生的幅射塵會被噴到高空
最後甚至攪進TC的環流之中 更恐怖0.0
不過以上為個人推測 參考參考就好